Quote:
Originally Posted by ryberg
Riigghhhht... That's the point.
You're arguing my point now? (Well, also the point MWC was making, I believe, in fairness.)
You argued that litigation would be welcome and appropriate if the Clinton campaign found something in the TX primary to be unfair. I said, by that argument, Obama should have already begun litigation re superdelegates (and Clinton should have begun litigation re both MI & FL and against the caucus system in general). When asked for clarification, I said, in each case the issue would be somebody in the race who thinks something is unfair going to litigation on it.
Steve
|
Your persist in being unable to state your case clearly, much less have much luck in repeating mine *sigh*
The rules about super-delegates are wrote down
The Democratic convention can change just about any rules it wants to and still be within the rules. That rule is also wrote down.
Both those are national DNC issues.
Texas rules that ain't wrote down is state party stuff.
There is very little similarity where you seek it.
So sad.