Quote:
Originally Posted by ryberg
Ah, but there's so much to cover, and now Roni's back with his same approach -- another duel that started well before this! 
I tell you what: how about when Roni takes those Clinton negatives into account and explains why these Obama negatives are potentially worse, I rest on him and get back to you on that article? 
Think it'll happen? 
Well, anyway, I'll get there. But as Jacko and JL have been saying all along many things I agree with -- and as again it all in the end has to fall into the context not of whether these things will hurt Obama, but whether they will hurt Obama more than Clinton's problems will hurt her --- I can't be very optimistic that my response will be very much more satisfactory to you... 
Steve |
I don't understand what this has to do with Clinton? You can't go back and read a one page article because it might be critical of Obama? We can't discuss how these things might impact the national election because his opponents negatives are worse?
I'm trying very hard to understand the way this discussion is unfolding...
