Quote:
Originally Posted by melliedee
I think that view, while carefully considering the context and history of racism/sexism (which a I can appreciate), is at its heart a bit insulting to the intelligence of voters. If a woman told me she was voting for Hillary just because she is a woman, I'd feel free to call her an idiot. It's not just conservatives hollering about this; I am too.
Why is the breakdown in KY only addressing race with the pundits? Why not the fact that Obama campaigned little there, and basically ceded because he know he could not win? Did that fact impact the margin as much as race might have? How is that any different than Clinton dissing the "unimportant" caucus states?
|
That is not accurate. While not there in person, he blanketed the state with ads, and outspent the Clinton campaign from I heard last night.
Why isn't anyone drawing a misogyny inference from the fact that 2/3rds of Oregon men voted for Obama?
