|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
aņejo
|
Digital SLR Canon EOS 350D
Hi all, I know a lot of you take a lot of pics... I am one of those maniacs too.
Now I am dreaming of a digital SLR. Does anyone know the Canon EOS 350D and can give me first hand experiences? I am a Canon-fan and would like to use the lenses and filters I already have. Furthermore a lot of the handling is similar to other Canon cameras so this would be familiar to me.Please let me know whatever info you might have. Critics and oppinions I have read so far were mostly great... Andrea |
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Non-aggressive Dutch dude
|
Quote:
http://www.playa.info/playa-forum/sh...50d#post213315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Non-aggressive Dutch dude
|
Quote:
![]() I simply remembered it, and figured to check by searching first. Here are a few online reviews (in case you missed one ):http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/ca...ew/index.shtml http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos350d/ http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EXT/EXTA.HTM http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...s/rebelxt.html http://www.dcviews.com/cameras/canon_news.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
party machine
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Minneapolis-St. Paul
Posts: 2,411
|
If you want to get more of a hands on feel for the 350D, you might want to try this excellent tutorial put together by Canon:
http://www.photoworkshop.com/canon/index.html As for using your old lens, unless they're an EF type (newer), you'll lose most of the in-camera functions like auto focus and light metering. Also, a 50mm lens from a 35mm camera will be much longer on a digital camera due to the smaller size of the CCD compared to the size of 35mm film. You'd have to switch the camera to full manual mode and would probably need to use a light meter in conjunction with it. Might be great for creative photography where you have time to setup but you'll probably miss that once in a lifetime shot on a regular basis. When I purchased my 350D, it was tough deciding between it and the Nikon D70. If you flipped a coin to make the decision, it would be a good choice either way. I ordered mine with the EFS 17-85 lens (not the kit lens) but it adds a considerable amount of weight and protrudes further from the body. Think tripod when you're shooting in anything but bright sky. I'd probably be the perfect candidate for the 10-22mm lens because I like to get up close and personal. Unfortunately, that lens will set you back about $700+ (US). Even though the 350D is small by digital SLR standards, it's still bulky compared to the largest point & shoot cameras. Depending on your intent for the camera, it's possible that the SLR might not be the best choice for you. At least with a quality point & shoot camera, most of your photos will be keepers. Less true for a digital SLR, where constant consideration of lighting conditions is an absolute must. Most individuals who switch to a D-SLR are initially disappointed with the results of their photos until they learn to tell the camera what it is that they want... Jimmy Last edited by JimmyMN : 08-27-2005 at 10:41 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
none
![]() Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 10,162
|
I KNEW it was only a matter of time before Jimmy chimed in with his expert advice.
I have a Canon 20D, and while I know it is considerably more expensive than the 350D (or Digital Rebel as it also called) I am VERY happy with it. I agree with Jimmy, though, it takes a bit more knowledge about the camera and photography to get really good photos. I am still learning! Here's one photo I took (among others that will be mass-displayed on my new website soon!) that I really like: ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
aņejo
|
Thanks guys, I bought the camera this morning and shot about 30 test pics with it already and I am more than happy with it.
My other lenses work perfectly with the new SLR-cam (tried my EFS 75-300 lense and it worked fine). Most of my cameras are Canon and so I am familiar with a lot of features already. Jimmy, I have the powershot A95 too and that was no longer enough. My plan for next year is to go the the South Pacific (French Polynesia, Samoa and Cook Islands). As this will be a 'once in a lifetime'-thing my A95 is not enough. I want to use filters, lenses AND want to know immediately whether the pic has turned out okay or not (as I will probably not have the chance to go back and shoot it again). So the digital SLR was a must for me. Will try to get familiar with the features and possibilities I have until then. Ginger, hope we can compare foto-experiences in Seattle... I had a look at the 20D too but with all the trips I've been doing lately it was just too expensive. And I think the 350D will do fine for me.Would load some pics up but I guess I should work on uploading the Texas pics instead... Will start on that task this evening...Andrea |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate