Playa del Carmen, Mexico's virtual guidebook written by locals
 

Go Back   www.Playa.info > Off Topic Stuff > General Off-Topic Stuff
Register Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread
Old 06-12-2006   #1 (permalink)
Jacko
aņejo
 
Jacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
If You Could Change Your Govt. Constitution...

What would be the one change you would make if you could change your country's constitution?

I would delete the 22nd amendment that limits our presidents to 2 four year terms......and then add a new amendment that allows for only one SIX year term. I think this would clear up a lot of the mess our second term presidents get us into and allow more time for the first term president to be effective.

IMO, The world is too complex these days to be as effective in 4 years as we need them to be.... and too dangerous to allow any one president the power of 8 years.....
Jacko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
register to remove these adverts
Old 06-12-2006   #2 (permalink)
roni
Happy Curmudgeon


 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 24,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacko
What would be the one change you would make if you could change your country's constitution?

I would delete the 22nd amendment that limits our presidents to 2 four year terms......and then add a new amendment that allows for only one SIX year term. I think this would clear up a lot of the mess our second term presidents get us into and allow more time for the first term president to be effective.

IMO, The world is too complex these days to be as effective in 4 years as we need them to be.... and too dangerous to allow any one president the power of 8 years.....
I would do away with term limits altogether and let voters decide when to term limit a president.
roni is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #3 (permalink)
sctx
Moniker Morpher


 
sctx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Body in San Marcos Tx....Tankah in my mind
Posts: 26,922
I'll expand Jacko's Six And Out to congresspersons as well....and screw their pension packages
sctx is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #4 (permalink)
Seakony
aņejo
 
Seakony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: no longer in Mesquite with nothing to do
Posts: 10,146
good morning all.

I ditto the above....and would change the amendment that any child born in the US must be of LEGAL immigrants to be a legal citizen.
Seakony is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #5 (permalink)
MikeW
aņejo
 
MikeW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 9,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacko
What would be the one change you would make if you could change your country's constitution?

I would delete the 22nd amendment that limits our presidents to 2 four year terms......and then add a new amendment that allows for only one SIX year term. I think this would clear up a lot of the mess our second term presidents get us into and allow more time for the first term president to be effective.

IMO, The world is too complex these days to be as effective in 4 years as we need them to be.... and too dangerous to allow any one president the power of 8 years.....
They could mess it up in their first term instead of their second, and they would have more time to mess it up. How about (4) 2-year terms?
MikeW is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #6 (permalink)
Just Lucky
link king
 
Just Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Fashionably Leftist" Austin
Posts: 5,801
I am generally not in favor of tinkering with the Constitution. I do think we need to overhaul campign financing. I suspect that there could be first amendement challenges coming out of meaningful campaign financing reform. It is hard to know how the courts would interpret this prior to it being tested. If there were to be any changes in terms, I think an extra year for House members would likely be the only one I would consider.
Just Lucky is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #7 (permalink)
MWC
aņejo
 
MWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,735
I would mandate one two-year term of service to the country from each individual, upon their turning voting age. (Give them a five-year window of opportunity to begin doing so)
To serve in either the military, or some kind of non profit service. Education, medical, Peace Corps, etc.

I would put the entire election process (including campaign finance and the actual voting/tallying process) out of the hands of party-oriented officials. I would instead create federal entity (akin to the US Postal Service) to oversee elections.

I agree, term limits for members of Congress. But I wouldn't make it a life-time limit, just a consecutive limit.
MWC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #8 (permalink)
JudyBluEyes
aņejo
 
JudyBluEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Playa Del Carmen
Posts: 4,560
I would go back and pass ERA!!!
JudyBluEyes is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #9 (permalink)
birdman
aņejo
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wa state
Posts: 1,578
Send a message via Yahoo to birdman
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWC
I would mandate one two-year term of service to the country from each individual, upon their turning voting age. (Give them a five-year window of opportunity to begin doing so)
To serve in either the military, or some kind of non profit service. Education, medical, Peace Corps, etc.

I would put the entire election process (including campaign finance and the actual voting/tallying process) out of the hands of party-oriented officials. I would instead create federal entity (akin to the US Postal Service) to oversee elections.

I agree, term limits for members of Congress. But I wouldn't make it a life-time limit, just a consecutive limit.
Sounds good to me. Maybe you should run for office you make more sence than most of the folks in there now.
birdman is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #10 (permalink)
Ginger
none
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 10,162
Bah, we don't have those silly constitutions up here in the great white north...
Ginger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #11 (permalink)
ryberg
playa maya guy
 
ryberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,229
Having the general impression that limiting positions to just one term here in Mexico has only seemed to exacerbate corruption -- if you can't get re-elected, why not just grab what you can? -- I would not go for this option, I'm afraid. This maybe an exampe in support of the road to hell being paved with good intentions.

Without thinking about it much, I guess I'd probably look at how we could take measures to end the affirmative action-style structures that are built in to the Constitution for the benefit of less populated states (the structure of the Senate, the Electoral College), as we got into on the Congress & Immigration thread some time back. BUt maybe there's something better to do, I don't know...

Steve
ryberg is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #12 (permalink)
Dallas91
aņejo
 
Dallas91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In my own little world most of the time LOL
Posts: 1,931
I'd allow Dilbert to run for office.
Dallas91 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #13 (permalink)
Jacko
aņejo
 
Jacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeW
They could mess it up in their first term instead of their second, and they would have more time to mess it up. How about (4) 2-year terms?
They would be campaigning ALL the time then!
Jacko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #14 (permalink)
Jacko
aņejo
 
Jacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Lucky
I am generally not in favor of tinkering with the Constitution. I do think we need to overhaul campign financing. I suspect that there could be first amendement challenges coming out of meaningful campaign financing reform. It is hard to know how the courts would interpret this prior to it being tested. If there were to be any changes in terms, I think an extra year for House members would likely be the only one I would consider.
"Tinkering" with the Constitution brought us a lot of really great amendments don't you think?
Jacko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2006   #15 (permalink)
Jacko
aņejo
 
Jacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWC
I would mandate one two-year term of service to the country from each individual, upon their turning voting age. (Give them a five-year window of opportunity to begin doing so)
To serve in either the military, or some kind of non profit service. Education, medical, Peace Corps, etc.

I would put the entire election process (including campaign finance and the actual voting/tallying process) out of the hands of party-oriented officials. I would instead create federal entity (akin to the US Postal Service) to oversee elections.

I agree, term limits for members of Congress. But I wouldn't make it a life-time limit, just a consecutive limit.
Oh I like this one!
Jacko is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate
link to us | contact us | sitemap | terms of use |©2008 Playa.Info all rights reserved