|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
|
If You Could Change Your Govt. Constitution...
What would be the one change you would make if you could change your country's constitution?
I would delete the 22nd amendment that limits our presidents to 2 four year terms......and then add a new amendment that allows for only one SIX year term. I think this would clear up a lot of the mess our second term presidents get us into and allow more time for the first term president to be effective. IMO, The world is too complex these days to be as effective in 4 years as we need them to be.... and too dangerous to allow any one president the power of 8 years..... |
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Happy Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 24,984
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 9,013
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
link king
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Fashionably Leftist" Austin
Posts: 5,801
|
I am generally not in favor of tinkering with the Constitution. I do think we need to overhaul campign financing. I suspect that there could be first amendement challenges coming out of meaningful campaign financing reform. It is hard to know how the courts would interpret this prior to it being tested. If there were to be any changes in terms, I think an extra year for House members would likely be the only one I would consider.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
aņejo
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,735
|
I would mandate one two-year term of service to the country from each individual, upon their turning voting age. (Give them a five-year window of opportunity to begin doing so)
To serve in either the military, or some kind of non profit service. Education, medical, Peace Corps, etc. I would put the entire election process (including campaign finance and the actual voting/tallying process) out of the hands of party-oriented officials. I would instead create federal entity (akin to the US Postal Service) to oversee elections. I agree, term limits for members of Congress. But I wouldn't make it a life-time limit, just a consecutive limit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
|
Quote:
Sounds good to me. Maybe you should run for office you make more sence than most of the folks in there now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,229
|
Having the general impression that limiting positions to just one term here in Mexico has only seemed to exacerbate corruption -- if you can't get re-elected, why not just grab what you can? -- I would not go for this option, I'm afraid. This maybe an exampe in support of the road to hell being paved with good intentions.
Without thinking about it much, I guess I'd probably look at how we could take measures to end the affirmative action-style structures that are built in to the Constitution for the benefit of less populated states (the structure of the Senate, the Electoral College), as we got into on the Congress & Immigration thread some time back. BUt maybe there's something better to do, I don't know... Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,749
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate