|
|
#91 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West of the Boston Tea Party
Posts: 4,047
|
Quote:
Head in the sand indeed. ![]() Last edited by itsmysecondtime : 01-29-2007 at 11:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#92 (permalink) | |
|
playa maya guy
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 9,724
|
Quote:
Well I get -- or at least I think I get -- the point properly, and that it's not racist. There's just such a radically different set of base assumptions that end up filtering whatever is being looked at in such a way that, like you said, it's like you and the other person might not even be from the same planet. I had the same feeling in a funnier sort of way about 3 years ago when a guest (actually someone who came to us through Playa.Info, though I don't have the impression he ever posted on the forums -- could be wrong, though! ) wanted to cancel the majority of his Christmas period stay here on the spot in order to spend more time in Mérida and who didn't want to pay any cancellation fee. So we're talking several hundred dollars here during the highest demand, highest value period of the entire year for any property down here, and zero notice, and he (apparently) thought we should just absorb that loss. Anyway, we had been talking for some time, with him often refusing to even look at the terms he'd agreed to and which I'd printed out for him to show him the relevant sections. Finally, however, he agreed, saying, "OK, OK... Show me the cancellation policy." I tried to do that but didn't get very far, as he cut me off with a wave of his hand and said, "You know, I fly first class, I work for [major American TV network], and I don't like policies." And just as in your case, Stewart, he was serious. That was, really and truly, his view. I really had no idea how to respond in words for a few seconds, I was so dumbfounded, but my immediate psychological reaction was to feel like people describe when they have an out-of-body or near-death experience, like I suddenly was floating up above the two of us in our reception area, looking down on the conversation from there. You just suddenly hit such radically different assumptions, and the reasoning based on them, deep down there, and you just have that feeling of total separation. I think this sort of thing also happens at times in discussions about topic X and policies and such, when it comes out that one of the people in the discussion is rather strongly of a given religious persuasion you don't share, because of course then it becomes clear that that person's asssumptions and reasoning stem from that, ultimately, but you don't have that. Anyway, there's an anecdote in response, FWIW. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 (permalink) | |
|
playa maya guy
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 9,724
|
Quote:
Geez, you'd think he'd go easy on his dad. You know, just beat 'em once and be done with it, not 4 times! Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West of the Boston Tea Party
Posts: 4,047
|
Quote:
As for Dubya's reaction, I wouldn't be surprised if he adapts the usual imperative attitude and assert that he'd rather go 12345, it's only a matter of time. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 (permalink) |
|
Happy Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 24,207
|
As Clinton Runs, Some Old Foes Stay on Sideline
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK Published: February 19, 2007 WASHINGTON, Feb. 16 — Back when Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was first lady, no one better embodied what she once called the “vast right-wing conspiracy” than Richard Mellon Scaife. Mr. Scaife, reclusive heir to the Mellon banking fortune, spent more than $2 million investigating and publicizing accusations about the supposed involvement of Mrs. Clinton and former President Bill Clinton in corrupt land deals, sexual affairs, drug running and murder. But now, as Mrs. Clinton is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, Mr. Scaife’s checkbook is staying in his pocket. Christopher Ruddy, who once worked full-time for Mr. Scaife investigating the Clintons and now runs a conservative online publication he co-owns with Mr. Scaife, said, “Both of us have had a rethinking.” “Clinton wasn’t such a bad president,” Mr. Ruddy said. “In fact, he was a pretty good president in a lot of ways, and Dick feels that way today.” As for the conservative response to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, Mr. Ruddy said, “The level of intensity and anger toward Hillary is not getting to the level that it was toward Bill Clinton when he was president.” He added, “She has moderated and developed a separate image.” more at NYTimes.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
|
Quote:
I loved Obama's comeback. I have more respect for that guy, every day. Probably wouldn't pull the lever for him, but its nice to see that someone is not going to let the Clinton's slide on their hypocritical stances. No matter how high the hopes are of Democrats, there is no way in hell that Hillary can win a national election. Even her ex supporters know she is a big phony. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,653
|
Quote:
First, think the Hillary camp is making a HUGE mistake in attacking Obama on this, and I think Obama had a terrific response. (To paraphrase, along the lines of "I don't know why I should be held responsible for someone else's comments. If the Clintons have an issue with David Geffen, they should take it up with him. Funny they didn't have issues with him when he was raising $18 million for them) Second, I also think the Hillary camp is making a HUGE mistake in attacking a former supporter. Talk about wanting to be anointed before the American public gets a chance to have its say! Third, I think the Hillary camp is making a HUGE mistake in attacking David Geffen. he is not only an effective fundraiser and a powerful Hollywood presence. He is also very influential in the gay community. The Clinton response shows absolutely no sense of perspective or humor. I never thought H was a viable Presidential candidate, but I did have some respect for her. Fading fast ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 (permalink) |
|
añejo
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 5,653
|
I am confused about what I am reading in the press about the Clinton-Obama-Geffen imbroglio.
From my POV, I thought the Clinton Camp looked petty for trying to damn Obama with Geffen's comments. And I though Obama deflected the whole thing nicely, with his "I don't see why I should be apologizing for someone else's comments." The post-game coverage talks about how Obama was dragged through the mud on this, and is running an "old way" campaign. WTF? |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 (permalink) | |
|
Fan of confusion
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Body in San Marcos Tx....Tankah in my mind
Posts: 26,313
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate