|
|
#11656 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,258
|
How offensive it must be to black voters to be so taken for granted and stereotyped. Again, it's just what Clyburn said.
No, she has a mathematical chance, she just has no realistic or reasonable chance to win, given the math. I believe mathematically speaking, I also still have a chance of winning the Democratic campaign for the nomination of a presidential candidate for this year. As do Edwards and Dodd and Richardson and that guy Gravel and Kucinich and -- well no, not his wife, 'cause she wasn't an American citizen by birth -- but an awful lot of other people. Nader has a chance to pull it off, just like he has a mathematical chance to win office as an independent. It's what's reasonable that's relevant, I think, especially with respect to the risks involved or the damage potential. Steve |
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#11658 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,792
|
Quote:
Really?...C'mon roni...step back there and think about what we are discussing here... Her negatives have gotten worse...trusting her is a major factor of concern in the Democratic electorate...think what it will be in the general.And you think somehow you have been more objective here than the rest of us? Ron....c'mon man...you got your data...I got my data...you should really think about not fooling yourself into thinking that somehow you have managed to keep yourself above this political fray and remain more objective ....IMO you are waist deep in the Hillary caca machine and you are drinking her kool-aid with as much thirst as the most avid Obama fan on the board.....![]() ![]() You still haven't told me what you think about her not objecting to the commentary about the flag pin labels and the suggestion that Obama is somehow un-patriotic because of it.....she could have objected...she should have objected...she did not....and that is just a start...does this sound presidential to you? Or just someone who is so anxious to win that she has lowered some of our most precious liberal ethics? Or the Weatherman bombing association and inference...should she have objected to that? Or is this just what we want in a "tough" candidate? And you have never mentioned what you thought about her "lie" about Bosnia..don't you think that significant as we all make character judgments and assess our ability to trust our candidates? Last edited by Jacko : 04-28-2008 at 07:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11659 (permalink) | |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,258
|
Quote:
The good thing is that superdelegates would almost certainly never be so blind to the good of the party (including of course themselves) as to let it cone to pass. I can easily imagine waves of defections of those previously committed to Clinton back to Obama to block any such move, if it ever got started. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11660 (permalink) | |
|
life=playa
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11661 (permalink) |
|
Happy Curmudgeon
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 25,067
|
Nobody is going to steal the nomination.
The Democratic party has rules for selecting a nominee. Those rules will be followed. Anyone who wins the vote of the delegates and gains the nomination will, by definition, be the legitimate nominee. Ya'll may not like all the rules. I don't like all the rules. The rules will probably change before 2012, but they are what we have for now. It is impossible for the nomination to be stolen. The candidate receiving the majority of delegate votes at the nominating convention will be the nominee. Last edited by roni : 04-29-2008 at 05:56 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11662 (permalink) | |
|
link king
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Fashionably Leftist" Austin
Posts: 5,830
|
Speaking of John McCain:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11663 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,792
|
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Jacko : 04-28-2008 at 07:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11666 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,258
|
The more I think about it, the more I'm floored by the idea that there's no need to be concerned about the black vote and that black people will still vote for Clinton even in a situation where the superdelegates (who again happen to be predominantly white) joined to go against the pledged delegate results after all this and make Clinton (who also happens to be white) the nomination over the first African American person to ever rise so high in the process.
Sheer and utter outrage on the part of women would be the justified response if the situation were reversed. So to then suggest that in that situation, Dems needn't worry about the female vote... Well as I say, I'm floored by such a suggestion and how offensive it must be to the given group being so taken for granted. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#11667 (permalink) | ||
|
link king
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: "Fashionably Leftist" Austin
Posts: 5,830
|
Quote:
Here's the way the next President of the United States looks at the race. Quote:
Is it possible we could follow his lead and talk about the issues and what's at stake in this election? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11670 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,792
|
Quote:
.......I agree it is up to Obama to find a way...one way to do this is to refuse to debate further given the nonsensical spectacles they have become.... I believe he will find a way...and I believe he will win the nomination and then the general election.... ![]() Last edited by Jacko : 04-28-2008 at 07:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate