|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,881
|
Quote:
Can we do better, the answer is yes. And we should. But that doesn't give anyone the right to break our laws. |
|
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 15,106
|
Quote:
It sucks !! for everyone involved !!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,881
|
Quote:
The short answer IMO, is yes they deserve to be separated from their children. They knowingly broke the laws, whatever moral ground you or they want to hold, it's not OK to just ignore it. Go anywhere else and break their labor laws and see what you get. No matter if your family is starving or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,432
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,881
|
Quote:
That's why this is not perfect. But to allow anyone to break the law and then say "aw it's OK you've got children" doesn't help. That thinking says a criminals who break the law get a pass if they have kids. The 14th amendment, which in effect gave children born on US soil citizenship, was passed to allow the children of the freed slaves citizenship. This should be immediately changed and there are bills in front of Congress to do so. A child born here should have the same status as the mother |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,432
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,881
|
Quote:
Here in Texas we have an old prison that is used for such cases. The children are allowed to stay there with their parents in a non-inclosed state, until deportation hearings are arranged. The facility has medical and schooling along with recreational equipment. The only thing is that they are not allowed to leave. The liberals are steaming becuase they believe it is tantamount to keeping kids in lockup - which it's not. I think it's a more compassionate way to handle it, instead of putting them into the foster care system. Nothing is perfect. We can do a better job with immigrants, both legal and illegal. But giving them a pass isn't the answer. Your point about kids with crackhead parents is well taken. I have no tolerance for that situation either and it directly affects my family. Both my wife's half-brother and half-sister have had their children taken away because they can't keep off drugs. And that's as it should be - they are both idiots. The court wouldn't allow us to keep the kids (because of indian issues) or I'd have all 4 of them gladly. Last edited by dartay; 03-15-2007 at 02:59 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,432
|
Quote:
I admire you for wanting to take care of your h-brother and h-sister's children. It is such a shame when people chose their selfish ways before their own flesh and blood. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,881
|
Quote:
Saying that, I'm sure if you're there it's not so nice just from the fact that you can't leave. There was just a big stink made about it in the local media because of a group of middle eastern immigrants who were here illegally and were sent there. From the pictures it definately wasn't prison-like, though you obviously can't hide the fact that it had been at one time. Allowing the kids to stay there with the mother IMO is a better solution. The law can be upheld and the families affected don't have to be split. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
aņejo
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 12,432
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
The system absolutlely does suck. The workers that the US needs are the exact same workers that cannot afford to migrate legally. It is an expensive and time-consuming process, and is not set up to accomodate the immediate needs of American businesses. If you need work in order to feed your family, you sure as hell don't have the time or money necessary to find an immigration lawyer, make multiple trips to a consulate, fill out stacks of paperwork and wait up to a year for an answer.
The vast majority of these people are not taking a job away from an American. the current unemployment rate is 4.5% and, from memory of my economics classes in college, full employment is considered 4%. So, what happens when you kick out all the illegals? There is a better way, as Tappy mentioned. The US has enough problems with Latin America. It doesn't need to add to those problems by shooting itself in the foot, in the process. Those that feel they are being robbed by illegals using services, ought to take a look at how much they would be paying for goods, services and taxes if it weren't for those illegals. Its like kicking yourself in the nuts because your toe itches. Raiding companies to give the appearance of "doing something" is nothing short of retarded. Separating kids from their parents is just plain spiteful. Shame on whoever is responsible. There is one area where the Congress and President agree. They should stop playing games long enough to pass immigration reform. Not build a fence, but do something that benefits everyone. Kicking illegals out of the country benefits no one. It may please a few people who have no concept of economics, but the rest of us have to suffer for that? Last edited by PlayadelSoul; 03-15-2007 at 03:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
life=playa
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 718
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
beachaholic
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 400
|
Quote:
)
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate