Playa del Carmen, Mexico's virtual guidebook written by locals
 

Go Back   www.Playa.info > Off Topic Stuff > General Off-Topic Stuff

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-19-2007   #16 (permalink)
my own peon

 
sctx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Body in San Marcos Tx....Tankah in my mind
Posts: 37,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeW
I was counting on that. Watching a bunch of congressmen running around, wondering what the hell is going on, wondering why the president knows every stupid thing we do and then tells the public about it.
i could just hear him........."I don't give a damn if it's 4:30 a.m, we ain't leavin here till we get this done"
sctx is offline   Reply With Quote
register to remove these adverts
Old 06-19-2007   #17 (permalink)
playa maya guy

 
ryberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: real America (reality-based community)
Posts: 28,027
It's not that I don't sympathize... I do sympathize. A parliamentary system of the type found in Europe has seemed pretty appealing to me ever since we first learned there could be, you know, different approaches to a representative democracy, in junior high or whenever that happened to be introduced. It would be great if a party could get some proportional representation in the legislature, for example, even if it's tiny, even if they have to get over a 5% bar in terms of the popular vote or whatever to get started. Then at least they can grow, and as has often been seen, they can be important in their own right, necessary to form coalitions so that a given one of the large parties can govern, etc. It's a more equitable system, I think. It's more like democracy, I think -- fewer sacrifices made to the spirit of democracy as it has practically to enter a representational form. And of course lots and lots of people would like some more serious change, and I'm sympathetic with that, too.

But I fear that sort of hope is inevitably extinguished when you look at how the system really works. No, the Constitution doesn't limit the number of parties or legislate a 2-party system, Ralph Nader and the Greens and others will tell you. But they tell you only the part of the story they want you to hear, as far as I can see. It's not that people are just dense, en masse, and continue voting for the same two parties they complain about, hitting their heads against that wall again and again. The system is tailored to and now built up around 2 parties, and people getting annoyed enough or another generation coming along is not going to result in a wave that rises up and changes that. That's the sort of hippie-era hangover "you say you wanna revolution, you tell me it's the institution, you better change your mind, instead" grassroots, consciousness raising stuff that Heath & Potter so successfully riddled full of holes in terms of any realistic possibility it might offer for change and improvement in society in The Rebel Sell.

Sorry to sound so cynical or curmudgeon-y. I like Obama's approach and that idea of the audacity of hope. I like it, though, in part, because it seems appropriately tempered with real world... well, realism.

Steve
__________________

ryberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #18 (permalink)
aņejo
 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 59,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by sctx
i could just hear him........."I don't give a damn if it's 4:30 a.m, we ain't leavin here till we get this done"
Congress would have chewed Ross up and spit him out.
No doubt about that.
roni is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #19 (permalink)
link king
 
Just Lucky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: We're all here because we aren't all there
Posts: 8,943
I am in generally in favor of third party candidates. I am however greatly concerned by what the world might look like should we have another Republican President with similarly poorly thought out domestic and foreign policies as the present one. I don't want to use up all the eek symbols available.
Just Lucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #20 (permalink)
playa maya guy

 
ryberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: real America (reality-based community)
Posts: 28,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound
Well, I value your opinion, Steve (except the one about Yes ) and on this topic it's about what I figured it would be and I'm guessing you won't be alone with it.


Nice one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by southbound
Anyway, I think Charity is right. We might not see it this time around, but I think the revolution is coming. Betcha we'll see it in our lifetime, Steve.
Well I tell you what: we get old and that happens? I owe you a Coke.

You, too, Charity.

You know, I think I feel a song coming on...





Steve
ryberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #21 (permalink)
aņejo
 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 59,890
Quote:
Originally Posted by pamplemoose77
maybe not in 2008... but i think as more people from my generation start voting and the babyboomers control starts to decline, it's more and more likely.

honestly, i'd rather "throw away my vote" on a 3rd party candidate than vote for the other guys just to make a point. and more and more people my age feel the same. but i don't have a chart for you
It would probably help if a few more of your generation and the one following you would actually vote.

I voted for an independent candidate back when Anderson, Congressman from Illinois ran as a moderate. I voted for Benjamen Spock, the pediatrician, back when McGovern started kissing Regular Party Ass back in Watergate Days , so I have not been opposed to voting out of the 2 party system.
roni is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #22 (permalink)
aņejo
 
pamplemoose77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: dallas - kinda, tx
Posts: 9,713
Send a message via AIM to pamplemoose77 Send a message via Yahoo to pamplemoose77
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryberg
Well I tell you what: we get old and that happens? I owe you a Coke.

You, too, Charity.
i don't drink Coke, but i'll take you up on that. maybe i'll like coke by the time the 3rd party woman wins
pamplemoose77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #23 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Cosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,470
Pretty soon we shall have progress, not congress...or both.
Cosmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #24 (permalink)
my own peon

 
sctx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Body in San Marcos Tx....Tankah in my mind
Posts: 37,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by roni
Congress would have chewed Ross up and spit him out.
No doubt about that.
I don't buy that, he woulda made them look like fools for protecting the status quo........not that it takes much to make them look like fools protecting the staus quo
sctx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #25 (permalink)
aņejo
 
pamplemoose77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: dallas - kinda, tx
Posts: 9,713
Send a message via AIM to pamplemoose77 Send a message via Yahoo to pamplemoose77
Quote:
Originally Posted by roni
It would probably help if a few more of your generation and the one following you would actually vote.
i agree.. i haven't voted in any presidential elections up to this point cuz it seemed pointless to me (save the flaming, i know, i know)...

but the older i get, the more exasperated i get with hearing everyone b*tch about everything.. and heck, if getting a 3rd party would break up some of the left/right squabbling, i'd start hassling everyone i know to vote for them. not that i have as much sway as the "rock the vote" movement.. but whatever...
pamplemoose77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #26 (permalink)
life=playa
 
southbound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Lucky
Do you have any idea of his stance on the major issues likely to sway the election?

I am fearful of any third party candidate who could split the Democratic vote.
Uh, well -- if you ask those kinds of questions, it's difficult for me to remain positive about his candicacy! Let's see: he favors strict gun control laws, supports same sex marriage, supports the current immigration reform measure, and he'd probably try to implement some kind of Federal ban on smoking. Oh, and I've never heard him utter a word about foreign policy. Ahem. Do you think he has a chance? But that makes it all the more interesting to see how how he will position himself. Of course, I'm assuming he's going to run.

But if he's not planning on running, then what the heck is he up to?
southbound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #27 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Cosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,470
I agree with Chastity...
Cosmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #28 (permalink)
aņejo
 
pamplemoose77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: dallas - kinda, tx
Posts: 9,713
Send a message via AIM to pamplemoose77 Send a message via Yahoo to pamplemoose77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmo
I agree with Chastity...
omg, you're killing me!
pamplemoose77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #29 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Cosmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 9,470
Everything feeling good?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pamplemoose77
omg, you're killing me!
Cosmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007   #30 (permalink)
aņejo
 
pamplemoose77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: dallas - kinda, tx
Posts: 9,713
Send a message via AIM to pamplemoose77 Send a message via Yahoo to pamplemoose77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cosmo
Everything feeling good?
well i'm doubting my sanity now that i've posted several times in a political thread, but other than that, yes!
pamplemoose77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO