|
|
#211 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
|
Quote:
i can read all about diving and never choose to engage in it.. even if i know all of the facts, such as the handful you presented to me tonight. i can learn all about the rules of scuba and why they are there to keep me safe and decide it is too much work and not enough fun. i can decide it costs too much time and money. i can decide it's not worth giving up drinking or other fun diversion in exchange for the experience. i can watch a million specials or movies about the merits of diving or the downfalls of diving. i can talk with people who tried it and loved it. i can talk with people who tried it and had such a bad experience that they never returned to dive again. i can talk to people who took an intro course and never got past the shallow end of the pool and wonder what all the hubbub is about. i can see the weights and the tanks and the equipment that is necessary and surmise that it's not for me. and in the end, i'd be missing out on a really great experience. but scuba's not for everyone, right? some people will never learn to dive, no matter how great other people say it is. i am fully aware that you know the ins and outs of scuba and the science behind it all. i appreciate that. i think it's fascinating. i realize that my analogy falls short in quantifiable evidence for the scientifically minded. what i was trying to emphasize is the wonder that goes along with the experience. the freedom that can be achieved when the sport is fully learned and embraced. you will never be able to fully convey to me the breathtaking experience that i have always assumed scuba to be thru words or diagrams or photos or scientific explanations by the book full. i can't experience it until i've experienced it. |
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#213 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you
Posts: 9,295
|
Quote:
Of course, but should you state that seeing the Great Sardine Run grants you automatic entry into the Garden of Eden you haven't got the right to feel insulted if the diving community questions your assertion vigorously and demands that you present evidence to that effect: after all, failing to do so would be selfish in the extreme because you would be preventing millions of others from enjoying the same divine largesse as yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#214 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
|
Quote:
i'll also make sure i don't tease the divers or insult them for their choices, even when i don't understand them or choose to partake with them |
|
|
|
|
|
#216 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you
Posts: 9,295
|
Quote:
On a religious note, I will repeatedly insult those "christians" who have caused millions of death from AIDS because they have convinced the poorest, the hopeless and the most wretched that they'll end up in hell if they use condoms during sex. You may respect people like the former because it's their belief, but I certainly don't and never will. Neither I will respect "muslims" who terrorise my fellow men in the name of their god, nor those of any denomination who although not even coming close to these horrific crimes against Humanity take advantage of other people's goodwill to deceitfully propagate their religious agenda: in my book it amply shows an absolute lack of respect for the honest opinions of others. Last edited by Daddy B; 04-24-2008 at 11:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#219 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#221 (permalink) | |
|
link king
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Out On the Edge.
Posts: 6,581
|
Quote:
Dude, it should be remembered that her analogy is imperfect. I think she has made a gallant effort to explain the unexplainable. Maybe you should let it be? Last edited by Just Lucky; 04-24-2008 at 11:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#223 (permalink) | |
|
añejo
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#224 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,843
|
Well like Mercy in the original post of this thread, I am not being sarcastic or otherwise difficult or whatever with the following comment. And I confess that I offer it (in a rare situation, for me) without having read through the entire thread (in part because the thread was umpteen pages long before even 24 hours went by!).
But it seems to me that the original question of the thread is effectively starting with the assumption that God (however usually thought of) does in fact exist, and asking non-believers to sort of prove that God does not exist. Or something tantamount to that (even if the immediate question is more about what non-believers do in dire situations and so forth). I'm not sure that is, in the end, the right or fair way to start off and base such a discussion, myself. Philosophy and religion have instead started off and based their discussions on God in the more intuitive way, by saying, let's see if we can prove that God does exist, since we don't have the normal type of evidence for such existence. It does get back to those more immediate questions, too, as the implication is that people who are not religious are lacking something when in dire situations. People who are not religious, though, could simply point out that they are not lacking something because the comfort or beliefs of those who are religious are not somehow real or valid or are the opiate of the masses or whatever. In fact, people who are not religious might see themselves as in a better position to deal with such crises or whatever, as they are not in some kind of religion-induced fog about their lives and reality and the nature of the world and so forth. (You think that's an exaggeration? Just watch a non-religious person throw up their hands in frustration and disbelief when a religious person reaches the point with reference to a very negative situation of saying something like, oh, well, that's God's will, I guess!) I'm not trying to take a side on this, I'm just saying that, even if it was unintentional, the original approach seems to be biased in such a way that Mercy and others won't get the kind of answer they may be interested in getting, because probably no satisfactory answer can be given, due to that bias inherent in the nature of the question. That's my 0.02 USD worth, anyway. ![]() Steve
__________________
McCain has to meet a higher standard. Not having a compelling economic message before the financial crisis hit was malpractice; now it’s madness. McCain’s pet causes of bipartisanship and earmark reform don’t qualify as such a message . . . McCain has suffered from his own manifest lack of interest in economic issues. Last edited by ryberg; 04-24-2008 at 11:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#225 (permalink) | |
|
crab killer
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: I am Canadian!!
Posts: 14,293
|
Quote:
Your Results: 1. Unitarian Universalism (100%) See selected books about Unitarian Universalism. See selected books about Secular Humanism. See selected books about Neo-Pagan. See selected books about Theravada Buddhism. See selected books about Liberal Quakers. See selected books about New Age. See selected books about Mahayana Buddhism |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate