Presidential Campaign: 2012

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by james

But apparently your life is pathetic enough to post gay porn and middle finger shots and join in the 'those that don't agree with me are idiots' gang.

Pretty sad.

Gay porn? Really? Is that what it is? Gay Porn? Maybe you can explain why someone finds the need to continually correct someones grammar or spelling? Is it someone wanting to be a teacher? Editor? Writer? Please explain it to me after eight years of seeing it, and never understanding it, but watching members beside myself comment on it. What is the need that someone has to do that?

If it was truly "Gay Porn" would you have really left it up on the forum?

[Mnbruce]

Originally Posted by james

But apparently your life is pathetic enough to post gay porn and middle finger shots and join in the 'those that don't agree with me are idiots' gang.

Pretty sad.

OUCH!

[Luv2Dance]

Originally Posted by Rissask

Sometimes reading threads like this one makes me feel like crying.

Could easily be changed to "Potshot 2012" thread.....................

[Mnbruce]

Originally Posted by Mikey

But as illiterate as I am, I am glad my life is not so pathetic that I run around correcting peoples mistakes.

I'm not about to go back looking for it, but I'm pretty sure you did such a thing to me a while back.

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by Mnbruce

I'm not about to go back looking for it, but I'm pretty sure you did such a thing to me a while back.

Because you and I were more than likely talking about something and because you too have made comments about peoples spelling or lack there of I believe. It's not like I pop in and just correct your spelling and am out of here. Didn't you call DH an idiot not long ago? I know I'm moronic and illiterate perfectly acceptable terms to call people. I guess you have to have a certain IQ to be able to get away with that.

[Babaloo]

Originally Posted by Mikey

Maybe you can explain why someone finds the need to continually correct someones grammar or spelling?

Not continually. Occasionally.
It seems to get your dander up.

[birdman]

Originally Posted by Mikey

Gay porn? Really? Is that what it is? Gay Porn? Maybe you can explain why someone finds the need to continually correct someones grammar or spelling? Is it someone wanting to be a teacher? Editor? Writer? Please explain it to me after eight years of seeing it, and never understanding it, but watching members beside myself comment on it. What is the need that someone has to do that?

Mikey,
It is because they have no life & are in need of diverting attention from their own stupidity to someone else.

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by Babaloo

Not continually. Occasionally.
It seems to get your dander up.

Not only mine. If you look on the link I provided "just for you" you will see what other people have to say about people like you that do the same thing. When I get home for lunch will post some of the comments they use to describe. Pretty on par for the descriptions used on here.

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by birdman

Mikey,
It is because they have no life & are in need of diverting attention from their own stupidity to someone else.

That is very similar to a comment from the forum I was talking about above. And I'm starting to get it now. It takes a little longer for a illiterate moron to catch on. But I just keep plugging away trying to understand.

[roni]

Originally Posted by birdman

Mikey,
It is because they have no life & are in need of diverting attention from their own stupidity to someone else.

That is most likely incorrect.

[birdman]

Originally Posted by ProfessorPibil

Are you paying more in federal taxes today than you were 3 years ago, birdman bin laden?

Typical liberal reaction; when you can not use common sence or facts to get across the same lame argument that you were taught at the wine & cheese tastings, switch to rude comments & name calling.
Yes I am paying more today than 3 years ago, not because of anything the libs or dems have done but because I get up every morning & work to grow my business, regardless of how much you & your friends would like to see that made impossible.

[Mikey]

Originally Posted by roni

That is most likely incorrect.

So what would be most likely correct?

[birdman]

Originally Posted by Mikey

That is very similar to a comment from the forum I was talking about above. And I'm starting to get it now. It takes a little longer for a illiterate moron to catch on. But I just keep plugging away trying to understand.

The good thing is; there are more of us than them.
As stated before, most of them have not had an original thought since I started logging onto this thread 5 -6 years ago.
I use it mainly for comic relief & to see what the other side is being fed & I still think there is something bad in the water in Minn.
Been fun kids I gotta go make some more $$ & help pay down that muliti trillion $$ debt Barack Obama is running up.
Buying votes aint cheap.

[ryberg]

Holy tailspins, Batman! What's going on with this thread all of a sudden?

To post something (anything!) about presidential politics again, I laughed today when I saw that Politico has run an article asking if it will be Cuomo v Clinton in 2016. Guess the current race has become tiresome!

[roni]

Originally Posted by Mikey

So what would be most likely correct?

A statement that assigns different motivations to the posters in question would more likely be more correct. It is difficult to imagine that it would less correct than the statement in question.