Playa del Carmen, Mexico's virtual guidebook written by locals
 

Go Back   www.Playa.info > Off Topic Stuff > General Off-Topic Stuff

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-12-2012   #21601 (permalink)
aņejo
 
horizon200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Delaware
Posts: 10,417
Quote:
Originally Posted by roni View Post
The Fact Checker is establishing a new category for Romney's claims of credit for the auto industry turn-around:
At least they are an equal opportunity reporting source...

President Obama’s phony accounting on the auto industry bailout - The Washington Post

Quote:
The Pinocchio Test

The president is straining too hard. If the auto industry bailout is really a success, there should be no need to resort to trumped-up rhetoric and phony accounting to make your case. Let the facts speak for themselves.

Three Pinocchios
horizon200 is offline   Reply With Quote
register to remove these adverts
Old 05-12-2012   #21602 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,558
Obama is Scamming the Disabled - John Ransom - Townhall Finance Conservative Columnists and Financial Commentary - Page 1

In the last year, the civilian population rose by 3,638,000. Yet the labor force only rose by 945,000. Those not in the labor force rose by 2,693,000.

In the last month, actual employment fell by 169,000, but the unemployment rate dropped by .1%.

That is an amazing "achievement" to say the least.

How did Obama do this magic trick of moving unemployment from a high of 10 percent to 8.1 percent without adding, you know, jobs?

Well according to Shedlock, economists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley say that those on Social Security Disability (SSDI) checks have risen by about 2.2 million.


People who qualify for SSDI are automatically excluded from the workforce, meaning that you can actually have an economy losing jobs while technically the unemployment rate will go down as more people received disability benefits and are subtracted from the workforce.

Social Security Disability is a picture perfect program scam for the Obama administration. It allows Obama to say that unemployment is going down, while adding to the rolls of people who are dependent on some sort of Democrat-Party enabled government assistance.
I’m not ruling out incompetence completely, but when the administration has a vested interest in allowing fraud to happen by turning a blind eye, they act like caravan stuck in a sand storm, especially if it adds more potential voters to the dole.

And what’s worse, the damage done to the economy by this type of fraud - and to the legitimately disabled who need the benefits- will take generation to fix.

Because, while joblessness can be reversed with some sensible economic policies, adding to the disability rolls creates permanent damage to the economy from which the country will not recover in generations.

Writes Bloomberg.com:

Based on current trends, 7 percent of the nonelderly adult population could be receiving disability benefits by 2018, Richard Burkhauser and Mary Daly wrote in the spring issue of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. That’s two years after the SSDI program will run through its trust fund, according to an April report by the Social Security trustees.

So the Obama administration is using a program that is already insolvent for a kind of off-the-books loan.

And economists say that 99 percent of people who get disability payments remain on the dole for the rest of their life. Or until the country is broke. See Greece.

Even worse, the Bloomberg article makes it clear that disability is serving as a backstop to unemployment insurance. That is, when unemployment insurance runs out, the unemployed are using disability insurance by claiming “’difficult-to- verify disorders,’” including muscle pain and mental illness.”

Last week our own Charles Payne wrote about this phenomenon, calling disability fraud, which he named “crazy checks,” “the biggest scam since the welfare queens of the 1980s.”

Writes Payne:

It’s an epidemic nobody talks about because it could bleed into the sensitivity associated with legitimate recipients of social security disability insurance payments. The program provides money to people too young to get social security and unable to work.

Last year Dan Mitchell wrote about a Washington Times expose that uncovered a 30 year old man and his roommate who were collecting disability payments under a disability known as adult baby syndrome. The male subject “has been living at least a partial adult baby lifestyle since his teenage years, though he does wear adult clothes when he goes out, fearing embarrassment otherwise,” writes the Times.

Thank God for embarrassment.

Of course embarrassment didn’t stop the guy from doing a reality TV episode where he sported his diapers for viewers.

Nor did embarrassment stop him from threatening suicide when the government started making inquiries into the legitimacy of his “disability.”

We have six months people to turn this around.

We went from a government that was broken and venial to a government that is broke, broken and more venial still.
I’d hate to see what another four years could bring.


Prior to these revelations, I had thought that the country’s workforce was shrinking because persistent joblessness was causing people to stop looking for work. In other words, I though it was just another example of Obama’s economic incompetence.

Last edited by D33RHUNT3R; 05-12-2012 at 10:15 AM..
D33RHUNT3R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21603 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Dan-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,502
Good for a chuckle...

Dan-0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21604 (permalink)
aņejo
 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 59,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
Ok Roni lets use your logic that i have highlighted above and apply it to something dear to you Shall we.
You have not distinguished yourself in this thread by your ability to use logic
roni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21605 (permalink)
aņejo
 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 59,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by horizon200 View Post
Well, that is pretty good but the President s an underachiever compared to Romney, who is getting his own category with a graphic as soon as they decide on the graphic.
roni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21606 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Robinhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by roni View Post
You have not distinguished yourself in this thread by your ability to use logic
Great answer Roni From you Par for the course i guess.
Robinhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21607 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 7,558
"Remember when the country rallied around you in the hopes of a better tomorrow?" Kimmel asked. "That was hilarious."
Kimmel said there was a term for "guys like the president," and it wasn't two terms.

D33RHUNT3R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21608 (permalink)
Jo
Niiiice!!
 
Jo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In the cukoos nest....
Posts: 6,217
Read the headlines about Obama supporting gay marriage today- I love it. For one because I am pro gay marriage- but also because I have no doubt the campaigns will now have a totally different drive to them.
Jo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21609 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Mnbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St. Louis Park,Mn.
Posts: 3,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by D33RHUNT3R View Post
"Remember when the country rallied around you in the hopes of a better tomorrow?" Kimmel asked. "That was hilarious."
Kimmel said there was a term for "guys like the president," and it wasn't two terms.

What was that,three weeks ago? It works much better when it's told, not so much when you try it.
Mnbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21610 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Mnbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St. Louis Park,Mn.
Posts: 3,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
Great answer Roni From you Par for the course i guess.
Maybe he realized your attempt was a bit lame because two things were not really analogous.

Last edited by Mnbruce; 05-12-2012 at 12:17 PM..
Mnbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21611 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Robinhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mnbruce View Post
Maybe he realized your attempt was a bit lame because two things were not close to a proper analogy.
Read Ronis post again ,he made his point by saying that because it was Romneys supposed friends making the claim that somehow gave the story validity? I made the same analogy as he did using Obamas physician . Both analogies use the close ties to the person in question. So explain to me how this is lame? Are the 2 not comparable? Oh yeah sorry i forgot It doesn't fit the liberal form of logic. My bad. Which is we can dish it out but we can't take it
Robinhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21612 (permalink)
aņejo
 
gingele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 11,452
Send a message via Skype™ to gingele
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
Read Ronis post again ,he made his point by saying that because it was Romneys supposed friends making the claim that somehow gave the story validity? I made the same analogy as he did using Obamas physician . Both analogies use the close ties to the person in question. So explain to me how this is lame? Are the 2 not comparable? Oh yeah sorry i forgot It doesn't fit the liberal form of logic. My bad. Which is we can dish it out but we can't take it
They are not analogous because one story involves multiple first person, eyewitness accounts of an attack on a teenager, and the other involves a single personal opinion regarding the ACA.

Yeah. Same thing.
gingele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21613 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Robinhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by gingele View Post
They are not analogous because one story involves multiple first person, eyewitness accounts of an attack on a teenager, and the other involves a single personal opinion regarding the ACA.

Yeah. Same thing.
Wow you liberals are the same on this forum as you are in the real world ...Dependent on each other. I guess you could call your rescue of Roni FORUM WELFARE? I imagine people on the right see my point clearly Maybe we should stick to whats really important to Americans ...Jobs And the Economy. I can understand why supporters of Obama would want to discuss Romneys teenage years instead when you take his performance with respect to the economy and jobs into consideration. Actually not so funny.
Robinhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21614 (permalink)
aņejo
 
gingele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 11,452
Send a message via Skype™ to gingele
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
Wow you liberals are the same on this forum as you are in the real world ...Dependent on each other. I guess you could call your rescue of Roni FORUM WELFARE? I imagine people on the right see my point clearly Maybe we should stick to whats really important to Americans ...Jobs And the Economy. I can understand why supporters of Obama would want to discuss Romneys teenage years instead when you take his performance with respect to the economy and jobs into consideration. Actually not so funny.
I wasn't discussing Romney's teenage years. I was pointing out how your posted story was in no way analogous to the story involving Romney - something you asked directly about.

But I gotta hand it to you, RH. Your post quoted above includes at least 3 different deflections in response to my post ("liberals all stick together/ forum welfare," "the righties will stick together here," [<---love the inherent hypocrisy with these two] and "it's the economy"). Next time I'd suggest adding "LOOK! It's Elvis!" just for some additional flair.
gingele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2012   #21615 (permalink)
aņejo
 
Mnbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St. Louis Park,Mn.
Posts: 3,618
Quote:
Originally Posted by gingele View Post
They are not analogous because one story involves multiple first person, eyewitness accounts of an attack on a teenager, and the other involves a single personal opinion regarding the ACA.

Yeah. Same thing.
I was just going to sit down and explain this to RH, but you did that for me. Thank you!

I guess I should have explained it in my original post, but I thought RH would have understood what I was saying.
Mnbruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO