Playa del Carmen, Mexico's virtual guidebook written by locals
 

Go Back   www.Playa.info > Off Topic Stuff > General Off-Topic Stuff

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-06-2012   #13036 (permalink)
añejo
 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 59,636
212k private sector jobs created in December

Widespread growth across sectors

Average hours went up

Unemployment rate 8.5%
roni is online now   Reply With Quote
register to remove these adverts
Old 01-06-2012   #13037 (permalink)
he likes it!
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27,429
Send a message via Skype™ to Mikey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
I UNDERSTAND THIS MR. KRUGMAN AND SO DO MILLIONS OF AMERICANS

The following are 34 shocking facts about U.S. debt that should set America on fire with anger....
#1 During fiscal year 2011, the U.S. government spent 3.7 trillion dollars but it only brought in 2.4 trillion dollars.
#2 When Ronald Reagan took office, the U.S. national debt was less than 1 trillion dollars. Today, the U.S. national debt is over 15.2 trillion dollars.
#3 During 2011, U.S. debt surpassed 100 percent of GDP for the first time ever.
#4 According to Wikipedia, the monetary base "consists of coins, paper money (both as bank vault cash and as currency circulating in the public), and commercial banks' reserves with the central bank." Currently the U.S. monetary base is sitting somewhere around 2.7 trillion dollars. So if you went out and gathered all of that money up it would only make a small dent in our national debt. But afterwards there would be no currency for anyone to use.
#5 The U.S. government spent over 454 billion dollars just on interest on the national debt during fiscal 2011.
#6 The U.S. government has total assets of 2.7 trillion dollars and has total liabilities of 17.5 trillion dollars. The liabilities do not even count 4.7 trillion dollars of intragovernmental debt that is currently outstanding.
#7 During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.
#8 It is being projected that the U.S. national debt will surpass 23 trillion dollars in 2015.
#9 According to the GAO, the U.S. government is facing 34 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities for social insurance programs such as Social Security and Medicare. These are obligations that we have already committed ourselves to but that we do not have any money for.
#10 Others estimate that the unfunded liabilities of the U.S. government now total over 117 trillion dollars.
#11 According to the GAO, the ratio of debt held by the public to GDP is projected to reach 287 percent of GDP by 2086.
#12 Others are much less optimistic. A recently revised IMF policy paper entitled “An Analysis of U.S. Fiscal and Generational Imbalances: Who Will Pay and How?” projects that U.S. government debt will rise to about 400 percent of GDP by the year 2050.
#13 The United States government is responsible for more than a third of all the government debt in the entire world.
#14 If you divide up the national debt equally among all U.S. taxpayers, each taxpayer would owe approximately $134,685.
#15 Mandatory federal spending surpassed total federal revenue for the first time ever in fiscal 2011. That was not supposed to happen until 50 years from now.
#16 Between 2007 and 2010, U.S. GDP grew by only 4.26%, but the U.S. national debt soared by 61% during that same time period.
#17 During Barack Obama's first two years in office, the U.S. government added more to the U.S. national debt than the first 100 U.S. Congresses combined.
#18 When you add up all spending by the federal government, state governments and local governments, it comes to 46.6% of GDP.
#19 Our nation is more addicted to government checks than ever before. In 1980, government transfer payments accounted for just 11.7% of all income. Today, government transfer payments account for 18.4% of all income.
#20 U.S. households are now actually receiving more money directly from the U.S. government than they are paying to the government in taxes.
#21 A staggering 48.5% of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.
#22 Back in 1965, only one out of every 50 Americans was on Medicaid. Today, one out of every 6 Americans is on Medicaid.
#23 In 1950, each retiree's Social Security benefit was paid for by 16 U.S. workers. According to new data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are now only 1.75 full-time private sector workers for each person that is receiving Social Security benefits in the United States.
#24 The U.S. government now says that the Medicare trust fund will run out five years faster than they were projecting just last year.
#25 Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP. Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.
#26 If the U.S. government was forced to use GAAP accounting principles (like all publicly-traded corporations must), the U.S. government budget deficit would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 trillion to $5 trillion each and every year.
#27 If you were alive when Christ was born and you spent one million dollars every single day since that point, you still would not have spent one trillion dollars by now. But this year alone the U.S. government is going to add more than a trillion dollars to the national debt.
#28 If right this moment you went out and started spending one dollar every single second, it would take you more than 31,000 years to spend one trillion dollars.
#29 A trillion $10 bills, if they were taped end to end, would wrap around the globe more than 380 times. That amount of money would still not be enough to pay off the U.S. national debt.
#30 If the federal government began right at this moment to repay the U.S. national debt at a rate of one dollar per second, it would take over 470,000 years to pay off the national debt.
#31 If Bill Gates gave every penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for 15 days.
#32 According to Professor Laurence J. Kotlikoff, the U.S. is facing a "fiscal gap" of over 200 trillion dollars in the future. The following is a brief excerpt from a recent article that he did for CNN....
The government's total indebtedness -- its fiscal gap -- now stands at $211 trillion, by my arithmetic. The fiscal gap is the difference, measured in present value, between all projected future spending obligations -- including our huge defense expenditures and massive entitlement programs, as well as making interest and principal payments on the official debt -- and all projected future taxes.
#33 If you add up all forms of debt in the United States (government, business and consumer), it comes to more than 56 trillion dollars. That is more than $683,000 per family. Unfortunately, the average amount of savings per family in the U.S. is only about $4,735.
#34 The U.S. national debt is now more than 5000 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913.
But do our leaders care about statistics such as these?
No.
In fact, Barack Obama says that we need to raise the debt limit by another 1.2 trillion dollars.
Just 1.2 trillion?

Mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13038 (permalink)
añejo
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 30,887
Quote:
Originally Posted by roni View Post
212k private sector jobs created in December

Widespread growth across sectors

Average hours went up

Unemployment rate 8.5%
This is going to make many radical conservatives very unhappy!
Jacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13039 (permalink)
añejo
 
roni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 59,636
Let there be no mistake about who is on the consumer's side and who is on the big mortgage brokers and bankers side.

Quote:
“We really have the same issues at heart. I intend to build that relationship with Congress,” Cordray said, adding that his office is highly popular with the public and already is planning actions that will demonstrate why its authority is justified. The best way to win over skeptics on Capitol Hill, he added, is simply to “keep our nose to the grindstone and keep doing our work.”

The business community and banking industry, however, continued to seethe over Obama’s installation of Cordray, and urged Senate Republicans to rise up against it.

Senators “ought to think creatively about how to fight back using its other powers — especially the power of the purse,” said a Wall Street Journal editorial, suggesting that the GOP needs to stand up to Obama’s “contempt for Congress.” A legal challenge must be included in the arsenal, the editorial asserted: “[P]rivate parties will have standing to sue if they are affected by one of Mr. Cordray’s rule-makings, and that’s when the courts may get a say” on the matter.

In an email to members, David H. Stevens, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association, warned that Cordray’s appointment will escalate hostilities between the White House and the GOP, resulting in more legislative gridlock. Stevens also threw his weight behind Republicans’ continued attempts for “structural changes” that would make the agency bipartisan and fairer to business.
Read more: Richard Cordray says recess appointment is legitimate - Joseph Williams - POLITICO.com
roni is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13040 (permalink)
añejo
 
Mnbruce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St. Louis Park,Mn.
Posts: 3,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seakony View Post
If you don't like my posts, then why lower yourself to my stupid level?????
It's your right, as long as the sites owners allow, to come here and make over the top and ridiculous statements. In turn, as long as the site owners allow, I can respond to those over the top and ridiculous posts. If you can't handle it put me on ignore, it's that simple.

I've got to go, as I have an appointment to get my rocks off.
Mnbruce is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13041 (permalink)
playa maya guy

 
ryberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: real America (reality-based community)
Posts: 27,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
The more repetition, the stronger the argument, you see.
ryberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13042 (permalink)
añejo
 
bearcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robinhood View Post
Don't get me wrong Steve when i say not debatable , i just feel that under the current system we are doomed as a nation. So it frustrates me when people make excuses or defend a system that is wrong. The hard party lines from the left and the right are destroying the country .We need new ideas or old ones that worked but our nation has been hijacked by a bunch of selfserving neocon crony capitalists that have brain washed us into thinking that all is good and they will go to extreme lengths to stay in power through the presstitute media and endless wars. Ron paul is the only one that i feel cannot be corrupted into keeping the status quo. You may not agree with some of his stances and i feel he needs to relax on some of those libertarian ideas.The world is not black and white its shades of grey but when it comes to the economy and foreign policy i would much rather live in RPs world than the one we have now.
I completely agree with the bolded part of your statement. The government seems to be catering to the more Liberal or Conservative members of their party and everyone in the middle, the ones hoping for adult leadership, is missing out on solutions of any kind, whether they be bold solutions or simple solutions. However, I completely disagree that your guy Ron Paul can do anything about it. He could bring unity between the Dems and Repubs but unfortunately for him it would be a unity against him and his policies.
bearcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13043 (permalink)
añejo
 
eccentrictinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 2,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by roni View Post
212k private sector jobs created in December

Widespread growth across sectors

Average hours went up

Unemployment rate 8.5%
Not to rain on your parade, Ron, but here's a dose of reality:

Unemployment Rate Would Be 10.9% If Size Of Workforce Was Same When Obama Took Office

As Paul Harvey used to say, "The Rest of the story'!

Quote:
The nonfarm payroll number prints at 200K on expectations of 155K. The Unemployment rate comes at 8.5% — lowest since February 2009, and down from an upward revised 8.7%. U-6 15.2% down from 15.6% in November. Average hourly earnings rose at 0.2%, in line with expectations, previous revised to -0.1% from unchanged. Private payrolls +212L vs Expectations of 178K. Manufacturing payrolls rose 23K vs Expectations of 155K. Yet the unemployment rate trickery still continues, with labor force participation (prior revised), now at a 27 year low of 64%, and the labor force itself declined by 50K from 153,937 to 153,887.In fact, persons not in the labor force have increased by 7.5 million since January 2007! Bottom line — dropping out of labor statistics is the new killing it.



One can only wonder how many more jobs will be killed and how many more people will leave the workforce while this job-killer President is in office. Fortunately, November will signal a turning point in our economy when 'not Obama' is elected.
eccentrictinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13044 (permalink)
añejo
 
Robinhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by bearcat View Post
I completely agree with the bolded part of your statement. The government seems to be catering to the more Liberal or Conservative members of their party and everyone in the middle, the ones hoping for adult leadership, is missing out on solutions of any kind, whether they be bold solutions or simple solutions. However, I completely disagree that your guy Ron Paul can do anything about it. He could bring unity between the Dems and Repubs but unfortunately for him it would be a unity against him and his policies.
Well i disagree with your assertion that if RP were president he would have no effect on foreign policy or our economic policy (the FED) .First we would not be posturing for another war as we are right now with Iran. If you follow the main stream media its obvious that the neocons are doing their best to portray the message that Iran must be attacked.Ask yourself who does this policy of wars and foreign intervention benefit? The beauty of our political system is that it offers checks and balances so that not one person can legislate his will upon the people without congressional approval. Having said that and with Obamas recent screw the constitution and congress attitude i am beginning to wonder who is really controlling our policies and legislative body? Is Obama and congress really serving the best interest of the people or do they answer to the lobbyists and elitists that are entrenched in our present day government??
Robinhood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13045 (permalink)
añejo
 
beerbreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,265
The headline the Republicans feared.

Unemployment rate lowest in 3 years.
beerbreath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13046 (permalink)
añejo
 
Luv2Dance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 25,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by beerbreath View Post
The headline the Republicans feared.

Unemployment rate lowest in 3 years.
Yes, because we all lack compassion and want people jobless and struggling in life.
Luv2Dance is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13047 (permalink)
he likes it!
 
Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 27,429
Send a message via Skype™ to Mikey
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv2dance View Post
yes, because we all lack compassion and want people jobless and struggling in life.
+1
Mikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13048 (permalink)
añejo
 
beerbreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 5,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luv2Dance View Post
Yes, because we all lack compassion and want people jobless and struggling in life.
No,you just want to win the election.
beerbreath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13049 (permalink)
añejo
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wa state
Posts: 2,856
Send a message via Yahoo to birdman
Quote:
Originally Posted by beerbreath View Post
The headline the Republicans feared.

Unemployment rate lowest in 3 years.
No, actually the Dems need to keep the people unemployed; as long as the dems can keep people dependant on gov. to provide food & housing they are gauranteed votes.
It has worked for the past 50 years & with about 50 million people now collecting food stamps & unemployment benefits it looks like we may be stuck with the morons in charge for few more years.
As for me & all the "republicans" I know we'd love to see a 100% employment rate with a chicken in every pot & a car in every garage.
I'm tired of being one of the 45% percent paying 100% of the taxes.
birdman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2012   #13050 (permalink)
añejo
 
Luv2Dance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 25,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by beerbreath View Post
No,you just want to win the election.
Really? Had no idea I was in the running.
Luv2Dance is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO