Climate Change- Are Our Genes to Blame for our Inaction?

[Jacko]

Originally Posted by Brent & Kim

If it is such a huge crises and detrement to society, why do we only hear about every now and then. If it were truely going to be world changing in the next decade or two, the gov'ts of the world would be doing something severe to change it. They are not. The climate is changing, I have no doubt, but not like the alarmist state.

Because you are not listening? And we ARE doing things to try to slow or mitigate the change...just not enough yet, or quickly enough.

[eccentrictinker]

[tmc]

Originally Posted by melliedee

Letter to senate from 17 scientific organizations:

http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/20...ate_letter.pdf

Sucks for them that they didn't wait a few more weeks to post their letter; they had the misfortune to quote the IPCC as one of their sources for "scientific consensus" just before the entire phony exercise that were the various IPCC reports were unmasked as fraudulent.

[Jacko]

Sucks that many can't see the difference between babies and bathwater.

[D33RHUNT3R]

Originally Posted by Jacko

Sucks that many can't see the difference between babies and bathwater.

Its only a Fetus its ok.....

[melliedee]

More about the scientific consensus on climate change:

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

[melliedee]

The Goddard Institute's surface temperature analysis:

Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs

[Brent & Kim]

Originally Posted by Jacko

Because you are not listening? And we ARE doing things to try to slow or mitigate the change...just not enough yet, or quickly enough.

I am listening. I have the news channels on all day while I work and not a whole lot of reporting of climate change.

[Jacko]

Originally Posted by Brent & Kim

I am listening. I have the news channels on all day while I work and not a whole lot of reporting of climate change.

Fox?

(are you reading melliedee's links there?)

[tmc]

Originally Posted by Jacko

Sucks that many can't see the difference between babies and bathwater.

Did you complete your analysis of how many of the myriad reports purporting to buttress the theory of AGW have been tainted by the use of the fraudulent CRU data; perhaps there are no babies in the bathwater at all?

[tmc]

Originally Posted by melliedee

More about the scientific consensus on climate change:

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf

Did you read and analyze what was written within; how many errors and fallacious connections did you encounter?

[D33RHUNT3R]

Originally Posted by tmc

Did you complete your analysis of how many of the myriad reports purporting to buttress the theory of AGW have been tainted by the use of the fraudulent CRU data; perhaps there are no babies in the bathwater at all?

excellent point..

[tmc]

Originally Posted by melliedee

The Goddard Institute's surface temperature analysis:

Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Graphs

Did you read the supporting data referenced in your charts, i.e. Hansen et al; did you notice the plateauing of temperature in the early part of this decade, with subsequent cooler values obtained since? Have any of these data, which represent mean surface temperature, been correlated with those data obtained via satellites; how were the data collected from sites affected by "urban heat sources" corrected?

[melliedee]

Originally Posted by tmc

Did you read and analyze what was written within; how many errors and fallacious connections did you encounter?

The breadth of earth scientists polled is explained, as is who actually responded and at what rate, and the percentage by response to the two questions which focus on consensus. The connection between the scientists' responses and those of the public (the Gallup poll cited) is perhaps unfair because the public does not generally base their conclusions on the kind of data which scientists do; but, I think that was merely comparative.

Did you encounter a fallacious connection in the survey cited?

[D33RHUNT3R]

Originally Posted by tmc

Did you read the supporting data referenced in your charts, i.e. Hansen et al; did you notice the plateauing of temperature in the early part of this decade, with subsequent cooler values obtained since? Have any of these data, which represent mean surface temperature, been correlated with those data obtained via satellites; how were the data collected from sites affected by "urban heat sources" corrected?

I'm gonna flunk this test .. The words are to getting to big..

I think your saying the sh!t dont add up ?