View Single Post

Old 01-31-2007   #5 (permalink)
Jacko
aņejo
 
Jacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,484
Quote:
Originally Posted by StephenB
I disagree. We went in there undermanned from the get go. I think it's time for all or nothing, but we should have done that from the start.
24,000 or so troops is "all or nothing"?? Too late for that tactic my friend....the political, tactical and strategic will, both in the U.S. and Iraq, is far past that point....at the beginning?...... Probably better to have gone in with a LOT more troops...now? Its just too late my friend....there is now a raging civil war in progress.
Jacko is offline   Reply With Quote
register to remove these adverts