|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
ruined
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Full time Playa persona
Posts: 80
|
Oh My! The poor Porto Real! If it was not for that monstrosity we would still have the beaches that we used to 12 years ago. Their building and the extension of the point is what caused the huge changes to begin with now, just imagine what the new pier will do! If you change the current flow, you will undoubtable change the properties of the beach. DUH!
|
|
|
|
| register to remove these adverts | |
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
lost on fifth
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tulum, MX
Posts: 15
|
its real romantic and all to walk down the beach hand in hand with your loved one with your feet in the caribbean. even more romantic to take your feet, and your loved one, out of the water only to stroll around all those stinkin nets. I hope it works.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
beach geek
admin Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: 10 year Playa resident lost in Kullavik, Sweden
Posts: 9,745
|
the beach reclamation project failed. the nets tore away from the posts.
as far as Porto Real causing all the problems, I've taken enough wave theory in the university to know that it's a very complex model to study. I've heard so many local experts blame it on one thing or another but I don't think it's been studied adequately to say. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
aņejo
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,168
|
So, all that stuff is gone now?
The last time I was in Playa, two years ago, the beach at the Alhambra was tiny. JimmyinMN recently sent me a photo of that spot, and the beach was HUGE (in comparison). Is it still? |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,839
|
Alhambra does have a photo on some of their promotional material of the beach looking very large indeed, larger than it's looked at any point during the entire time we've been in operation (which means virtually 2 years now).
Anyway, I was going to say as well that if I understand correctly, the GPR is footing a large portion, at least, of the bill for this pilot project. I can appreciate that, at least, and I'm not exactly out there every day with the goal of saying something especially nice about them. Maybe they are owning up to something and trying to make up for it? Or maybe they are just suffering more and have more capital than the small hotels and trying to get some of their own benefit? Either way, even if the reclamation doesn't reclaim much of anything, it's not a bad gesture. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,839
|
Uh, well, the poles and nets have never been taken down, actually. Unfortunately they're more exposed now than before, because as you might imagine, all that rain and extra runoff last week took a lot of sand with it. So things are looking pretty rocky right now, at least between the docks (haven't seen elsewhere).
I'm guessing they were fixing to take the poles and nets out not too long before the storm hit, but that they'll now be leaving them there for a good chunk longer. But that's just guessing -- I don't have any info on that. Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,839
|
Sorry, but our digital camera went down again not too long ago and we haven't gotten another one yet. Not that I'd exactly be running out to take pictures of the beach right now even if I did have one...
Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
playa maya guy
![]() Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wandering between the Village Vanguard, NYC, 1961 and the Plugged Nickel, Chicago, 1965
Posts: 10,839
|
Sorry. The beach isn't terrible right now. It's just not at its best, either, after that storm. I'm in the school of underestimating things so that people may in the end be pleasantly surprised but will almost certainly not be disappointed. You could certainly still be in a lot of places that are worse than Playa next week!
Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
sandflea
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1
|
Beach Restoration Problem
Beach Restoration Problem
I talked to Porto Real staffer who said that the beach rstoration project with the steel pipes driven into the sand and nets to catch the sand has cost the hotel $180,000. I told him of a Reefball foundation and Dr. Lee Harris from Florida Oceanography Institute who could evaluate the project and recommend an approach to the problem. WWW.reefball.com claims to be a non profit foundation for restoration of world's endangered reefs. It provides at cost moulds for thin shell concrete ball reef replacement structures to reinitiate corral growth and as a benefit to attenuate wave action and build up beach sand. This work is undertaken by community minded people and corporations thus the cost becomes minimal and results are generally very satisfactory. Last edited by Krystof; 07-30-2004 at 07:27 PM. Reason: bad spelling |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
home | forum | multiMedia | read more | directory | trip planning | real estate