Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayadelSoul
Greenland, a lush forest full of plant life and insects. Today, a block of ice. Not too hard to deduce that Greenland was warmer then (when there were no humans to emit greenhouse gasses). 
There exists no scientific evidence that X amount of greenhouse gas results in Y amount of temp change. There isn't even any evidence that X and Y are related, other than in theory. |
Again, your first statement, while very likely true
, certainly does not in any way lead to the second conclusion. Your second conclusion appears to be significantly likely to be in error based upon the
vast preponderance (is that like saying really, really vast amount?
) of scientific evidence.
There is very good reason for cautious avoidance of the manageable, negative consequences of your unscientific conclusion being wrong and the preponderance of scientific evidence being right on the subject of human-caused global warming/climate change.